My benchmarks
You vs. matched peers in the Caliber network · last 90 days
Headline
Your panel's deterioration → admission rate is 18%, vs. 31% for peers with similar case-mix. Top quartile.
Q1
Quality measures
Follow-up after MH hospitalization (7d)82% · top 15%
Network median 64%
Antidepressant management (acute phase)88% · top 10%
Network median 71%
Measurement-based care utilization84%
Network median 87%
Where you outperform
- +38%Engagement of SMI membersMore likely to keep members in care through episodes
- +22%Comorbid CHF + SMI outcomesYour CHF subpop on weight trend, fewer adm
- +14%Caregiver loop-in rateHigher HIPAA auth & care plan inclusion
Opportunities
- −9%SUD initiation in first 14 daysBelow network median; protocol suggestions in Library
Benchmark methodology
"Peers" = 47 Caliber-network clinicians matched on specialty (psych/PCP), state, panel size (±30%), and case-mix index (±0.4). Refreshed monthly. Benchmarks are advisory; not used in your contract, comp, or licensing. See methodology →